How To Make A Living Gambling Online

Lines, and it can greatly affect the amount of money you make betting online. Making Money Online Playing Skill-Based Games. You may notice that in the title of this section it does not say anything about “gambling.” This is because gambling refers to placing wagers on a game. The Bottom Line of How to Make Money Gambling Online. Hopefully, if you’ve read until this point, you have a pretty strong idea of the different options you have when it comes to making money gambling online. Depending on whether you’re just looking for some recreational fun or a way to. Sep 20, 2015  The newest way to gamble for a living online is to play daily or weekly fantasy sports contests for real money. These contests work just like season-long contests, but they’re over in a day or a week. And you face other players for real money. But like sports books.

Thread Rating:

Keyser
In a random game of bac., try as you might, you can't win in the long run, and you can't lose at a rate that exceeds the house edge. Please note that I did say, the 'LONG RUN'.
Many people believe that it's insane to state that you can't lose at a rate that exceeds the house edge in the long run, but it's true.
24Bingo

I don't 'guess'. Ever.
Now, does that mean that I do, in fact, know what the 'next cards will be'? Of course not.
But, Mosca, my friend, if you truly know how to approach and play this closed-end, shoe game called Baccarat, you truly can 'get really good' at it.
No, not knowing the exact cards, but knowing how certain shoe characteristics (read: trends) trends begin to develope, and how those trends flow from one to another. Heck, even the absence of trends is, in fact, a trend. It's a 'no-bet' trend, but a recognizable trend nonetheless, as recognizable as any domination (read: a trend where one side dominates most of the current results....very bettable).
Alot of you fellas in this esteemed forum seem to choose to believe in the casino math rather than in the player method. That's OK. I get it. Safe, very safe. Doesn't cost you fellas a dime to simply dismiss the game as unbeatable due to the built-in mathematics of it all. Safe, very safe. And, in this forum, might I add: popular, very popular.
But, know this: While the math is undeniable, that doesn't mean it's unbeatable. It doesn't preclude certain players from getting the better of this game.
But, that said, I ask myself: Who, exactly, am I trying to convince of this? Isn't it true that only I need believe in it for it to mean a thing to me? Sure it is.
So, you fellas can keep right on sitting on that most safest and popular side of the fence. Nice and warm and cozy over there, ain't it? Enjoy.....


If that's true, how do casinos exist? They're offering these games for free. If it were possible to be 'good' at it, by normal means (that is, means many players use, and a quick look at the baccarat table will tell you following trends is very much among them), they'd go bankrupt. You can see that in blackjack - if they get too tolerant of the relatively easy advantage play of card counting, as in the early days of Atlantic City, the game becomes a loser and is tightened or removed.
'While the math is undeniable, that doesn't mean it's unbeatable.' That's sort of the definition. If the undeniable math says it's unbeatable, it can't be beaten.
If you come to have too much confidence in your impossible system, you're setting yourself up for a massive fall.
The trick to poker is learning not to beat yourself up for your mistakes too much, and certainly not too little, but just the right amount.
Ahigh
Thanks for this post from:

Many people believe that it's insane to state that you can't lose at a rate that exceeds the house edge in the long run, but it's true.


This is exactly why dealers who deal on low minimum games to players who make minimum bets (flat betting with no pressure) that last the longest period of time nearly go insane!
Go to an empty $3 craps table and bet $3 on the pass line and no other bet and throw the dice as fast as possible and challenge yourself to see how much you can lose! It's going to take you more than 24 hours to lose $100 even if you get TERRIBLY unlucky, it will still take hours.
It would be like taking $100 worth of pennies and throwing them one at a time into a pond. There's just not enough variance to really win or lose flat betting without tremendous luck or bad luck.
24Bingo
The thing is, though, that you can lose at a rate that exceeds the house edge in the long run, and the dollar amount by which you might exceed the house edge with a given probability only increases. The only reason people say it 'levels out' is that the edge increases faster, so you become less likely to overcome it to the rapidly increasing break-even point, but more likely to lose any given amount beyond it.
The trick to poker is learning not to beat yourself up for your mistakes too much, and certainly not too little, but just the right amount.
liuryan

Assuming, rdw4potus? I don't assume very much, especially Bac-wise.
I just know that most shoes.....MOST shoes.....have a prevailing trend, which translates into dollars....REAL dollars.....'ASSUMING' one knows what to look for.
That trend might last a few decisions, it might last longer, but, make no mistake of it, it will put money into my pocket.
It also might dissipate as quickly as it appeared, in which case, I will lose my bet on it.
Then I'll await the next trend. If I find myself in a shoe where the trends are not 'holding', I'll 'sit on my hands' (read: no-bet).
When a decent trend does hold up for a few winning decisions, again, I make money on it.
So, let's recap:
I bet where I want to.
I bet when I want to.
I bet the amount I want to.
I quit when I want to.
For these player's edges (and a bit more in my arsenal), the casino charges me roughly 1% on each bet.
No 'assumining ANYTHING predictable', rdw4potus. I claim no predictive powers.
Still, I say: I'll take that bet. I'll graciously accept your house edge if you can live with mine. I'll take that bet.


Hi, What sort of trends are we talking about?
For example, do you bet on the opposite when you see 7 player wins or banker wins in a row?
Can you elaborate please?
24Bingo
gr8player isn't going to make money reliably, and he seems to vacillate on whether he knows it or not. His 'edge' is pure superstition. Remember, the universe runs on math, not feelings.
HowKeyser and teliot seem to have something, but good luck getting them to tell you. (Except for saying 'I was joking!' when you lose, but that might end badly.) I suppose the next time you play, you should look at the back of the next card in the shoe to see if a pattern forms. Although I've noticed (I'm not much of a table games player) that baccarat shoes have a kind of 'brush' that blackjack shoes don't, which I'm guessing is there with this in mind. Of course, don't cry foul when they kick you out; they're letting you play for free, so the game's got to be paid for somehow.
The trick to poker is learning not to beat yourself up for your mistakes too much, and certainly not too little, but just the right amount.
nezbit
you cant be pro at a 50/50 game with juice, its negative expectation and in the long run (what pros play on) you will end up down. so if anyone tells you they are pro, kindly tell them you are not their friend anymore.
Beethoven9th

Although I've noticed (I'm not much of a table games player) that baccarat shoes have a kind of 'brush' that blackjack shoes don't, which I'm guessing is there with this in mind.


Exactly. That's why I was so surprised when they talked about looking at the back of the cards. You can barely see it!
Fighting BS one post at a time!
Beethoven9th

Hi, What sort of trends are we talking about?
For example, do you bet on the opposite when you see 7 player wins or banker wins in a row?
Can you elaborate please?


Please don't listen to him. He's certainly entitled to his opinion, but the main problem I have with his posts is that new baccarat players might actually start buying what he says and will end up losing a lot of their money because of it.
Baccarat is a negative expectation game, and you cannot win trying to follow silly 'trends'.
Fighting BS one post at a time!
gr8player

Please don't listen to him. He's certainly entitled to his opinion, but the main problem I have with his posts is that new baccarat players might actually start buying what he says and will end up losing a lot of their money because of it.
Baccarat is a negative expectation game, and you cannot win trying to follow silly 'trends'.


How very noble of you, Beethoven9th. You're really concerned that 'new baccarat players might actually start buying what he says and will end up losing a lot of money vecause of it'. How very noble of you to save them from such a horrific fate...... ROTFLMAO!!!!!

How To Make A Living Gambling online, free


Hey, Beeethoven....
.....this is a gambling site. I'm not posting my Baccarat methodologies on any social media sites like Facebook or Twitter or You-Tube! I'm posting on gambling sites only. I'm attempting to converse with like-minded people on a gambling forum, but I wind up responding to know-nothings like yourself.
You know nothing of me.
But I know of you, Beethoven9th. You're a wannabe. A frustrated Bac player/loser. You can't help but disbelieve that anyone can possibly come out ahead at this game because you've only known failure.
So now you dismiss my trend play as 'silly'. That, too, is a mistake on your part, IMHO.

How To Make Real Money Gambling Online


I have preferred trends that I play.....when they appear I maximize my profits on their continuance, and when they don't I minimize the damage from their dissipation.Gambling for a living
If you, Beethoven9th, are yet another in this esteemed forum that believes that the casino's 'house edge' outperforms my 'brain-power of choice' (read: my player's edges), well, my friend, you're in the majority 'round here.
Just know that you're wearing that 'house edge'/negative expectancy stat like an albatross on your shoulders...the more and more you believe in it, the heavier and heavier it gets...to the point that your self-fulfilling prophecy comes true, and you succumb to it rather than attempt to get the better of it.
Yes, Beethoven9th, Baccarat is, as you put it above, a 'negative expectation' game....it appears that you're becoming a bit of the same to me.
  • Page 6 of 37